PX360 logoPX360

Start Your Project Review

Upload your construction documents and see what PX360 identifies for further review.

Analyze a Project Free

1 free analysis included · No credit card required

Want to see what PX360 produces first?

Already have an account?

What You Can Review
Drawings
Specifications
Addenda
Schedules
Upload
Analyze
Review

“Another layer of review before questions reach the field.”

Designed by construction professionals · Built for construction document review · Results require professional verification

PX360 | Plan Examination 360
PX360 blueprint review — layered plan sheets with findings and suggested next steps

PX360 helps project teams review construction documents to spot potential issues before they become field problems, RFIs, or change orders.

02Findings

See What PX360 Finds

Findings ranked by risk — each with its discipline, document references, and suggested next step.

Review findings organized by risk, discipline, and document reference — so your team knows what to act on first.

Anatomy of a FindingSample
Risk LevelHigh · Coordination Conflict
DisciplineStructural / Mechanical
Document ReferenceS-201 · M-110
Potential Impact$45K–$120K · 3–6 wk delay
Suggested Next StepIssue RFI to structural engineer
See How It Works
PX-360 · Medical Office Building
Analysis Complete
23
Total Findings
8
High Risk
$1.2M
Est. CO Exposure
HIGHCoordination Conflict

Mechanical Equipment Location Not Defined

Spec Section 23 05 00 references a 400-ton chiller but mechanical plans do not show equipment location or required clearances.

Mechanical / Structural$280K–$420K exposure
HIGHScope Gap

Electrical Panel Schedules Missing from Bid Set

MEDIUMDesign Gap

Roof Drain Leader Sizes Not Specified

Illustrative sample analysisYour findings will reference your documents
Upload
Drawings, specs, schedules, addenda — any format.
Analyze
The full package is reviewed across disciplines.
Review
Findings, references, and suggested next steps.
03Identify

What PX360 Helps Identify

Potential issues worth a closer look — organized so you can act on them.

Coordination Conflicts
Missing Information
Scope Gaps
Drawing / Specification Inconsistencies
Constructability Questions
Potential RFI Items

“The most expensive issue is usually the one nobody caught during document review.”

Coordination Conflicts

Ductwork, piping, and structural clashes across disciplines — flagged before field problems.

Missing Information

Missing panel schedules, details, or dimensions contractors need to price the work.

Scope Gaps

Equipment shown without the power, piping, or structural support to install it.

Drawing / Specification Inconsistencies

Drawings and specifications that tell different stories.

Constructability Questions

Congested ceilings, tight mechanical rooms, and installation challenges.

Potential RFI Items

Questions worth asking early — with suggested RFI language included.

Every category is mapped to document references, suggested RFIs, and review actions — nothing gets flagged without context.

04Sample

See a Sample Finding

Every finding includes the full context, cost impact, and a suggested RFI — not just a flag.

Primary DisciplineStructural
Related DisciplineMechanical / Electrical
Document ReferenceS-201 · M-110 · E-205
Cost Impact$45K–$120K
Schedule Risk3–6 week delay
StatusOpen
Suggested Action

Issue an RFI to confirm structural penetrations before concrete is poured.

Illustrative sample — not from a real customer project. Your findings will reference your documents and sheets.

High RiskCoordination Conflict
Finding #07 of 23

Structural Penetration Sleeves Not Coordinated with MEP Routing

Structural drawings show concrete shear walls on Grids C and F without penetration sleeves for MEP crossings. Mechanical and electrical drawings route ductwork and conduit through these walls at multiple elevations, but no coordination has occurred.

Why it matters

Field drilling of structural concrete post-pour requires engineering review, delays the MEP trades, and is a common source of costly change orders.

Primary DisciplineStructural
Related DisciplineMechanical / Electrical
Document ReferenceS-201, M-110, E-205
Cost Impact$45K–$120K
Schedule Risk3–6 week delay
StatusOpen
Suggested Action

Issue RFI to structural engineer requesting penetration sleeve schedule for all shear walls at Grid Lines C and F. Coordinate with mechanical and electrical engineers to confirm routing locations and required sleeve sizes before concrete is poured.

05Audience

Who PX-360 Is For

One review layer for everyone who prices, designs, or builds from the documents.

Contractors

Catch scope and coordination issues before bidding or field work.

Estimators

Identify missing information that may affect pricing.

Architects & Engineers

Add another layer of cross-discipline review.

Owners & Owner's Reps

Understand potential project risks before they become field problems.

“Questions found before bidding are easier to manage than problems found in the field.”

Contractors

Surface potential scope gaps before you bid — and before you build.

Bid & Buyout

Estimators

Reduce pricing assumptions and identify risks before your number goes out the door.

Preconstruction

Architects & Engineers

Catch coordination issues and reduce RFIs with an added layer of document review.

Design Review

Owners & Owner's Reps

Understand potential risks in the documents before approving them.

Project Oversight

See It In Action

Watch PX360 review a real bid package

Not Ready to Upload a Project Yet?

Get a Sample PX360 Analysis

See what a PX360 findings report looks like — organized findings, document references, risk categories, and suggested next steps. We'll only use your email for PX360 information you request.

06Get Started

What Might PX360 Find in Your Project?

Upload a construction document package and put PX360 to work.

Upload your documents and see what deserves a closer look.

DrawingsSpecsAddendaSchedules
PX360 ReviewFindings

PX360 findings are informational and require independent professional verification before use in bid, pricing, or construction decisions.